Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lenzuola di seta.jpg

File:Lenzuola di seta.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2024 at 06:28:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lenzuola di seta.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lenzuola di seta.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Tuscany
•  Info created and uploaded by Pamela Doretti - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 06:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support This photo also won 2nd place in WLE-IT 2023. While I'm not fond of the blown-out sun, the wow takes it for me. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Indeed. Yann (talk) 09:50, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment The composition had huge potential but presumably was taken with a phone/low quality camera (no EXIF) as there is little definition, noise and CA. No idea if the original could be reworked. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose presumably not going to be reworked. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support: refined the gallery to Tuscany. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Painterly and impressive scene. Quality is OK. – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support I don't think it's a phone camera. It has too much detail at full size for that. There's noise but I think the wow of the subject is enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 00:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting webs, unfortunately  Overprocessed image without metadata (like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5... by the same author). Unrealistic landscape in my view, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose ...agree and too much noise, tilted. Poco a poco (talk) 09:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support The noise is not too disturbing. A bit like all the Instagram eyecatchers but not so bad.--Ermell (talk) 23:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support An unusual scene, we shouldn't criticize the noise and other aspects for limited sensors, because it would basically be using the fallacy of why the photographer didn't take the photo with another camera, are we evaluating cameras or photographs? --Wilfredor (talk) 00:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Meiræ 20:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)